Introduction
Comparative Public administration took its own department of analysis and on the experiment from 1960 After the end of most of the wars around the globe. it started just like the post modem report of the war crisis, rise, decisions and its solutions with lots of experience data analysis. Aristotle had a good start with the CPA way of thinking.
The need for CPA.
The Scientific Approach to Administration
Generalisation and Globalisation
Decision making
Collectivism to Particularism.
Solutions to problems
The data source of Case studies -Input-output system
Creating proving models for situations
Intellectual Approach and Technical approach from modified traditions.
The Scope of CPA is to compare anything Administrative and purposely the bureaucratic behaviour of it.
Approaches of CPA
Ecological Approach
Development Approach
Behavioural approach
General system approach
Bureaucratic approach
Structural functional approach
component approch
Functions and Trends of CPA
Normative to Emperical
ideographic to Nomothetic
Non-ecological to Ecological
Models of CPA
Weberian Bureaucratic model
Rigs- Prismatic model & Sala model
Bazarcanteen Model
Feral heady comparisons
Information energy Model
Why is a comparative study of administration necessary?
The study of comparative public administration
contributes to a greater understanding of the individual characteristics of administrative systems functioning in different nations and then we can endeavour to adopt those practices which can fit in our own nations and systems.
Why are Comparisons important to the practice of public administration?
Comparative public administration helps, administrators, researchers and policymakers understand the successes and failures of counterpart administrative systems. Building upon a model of success or against known failures is a task that has you in the position of advantage always
https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/Content/92940/PDF/01_03_D_Cendrowicz_On_the_need_for_comparative_study_of_public_administration.pdf
תגובות